Voltar aos artigos
PMID 4221503129 de maio de 2026Sem full text aberto confirmado

Impact of flash glucose monitoring versus capillary blood glucose monitoring on glycaemia in Indian youth with type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study.

BMJ paediatrics open · Saiyed M, James S, Eigenmann C, Haynes A, Von Oettingen J, Ogle GD, Saboo B

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data relating to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) use in low-resource settings are limited. Our study investigated the impact of FGM versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycaemia in Ahmedabad, India.

METHODS

A randomised crossover study of FGM versus SMBG was undertaken. Participants aged 10-25 years (type 1 diabetes (T1D)>1 year) were randomised 1:1 to either Freestyle Libre 1 FGM use (intervention) for 6 months, followed by SMBG≥4 times/day (local care standard) for 6 months; or SMBG≥4 times/day, followed by FGM. After 12 months, everyone entered a 6-month observation period using the monitoring method choice. Insulin and dietary adjustments were undertaken as per local care standards. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at 0, 3 and 6 months (period 1) and 9 and 12 months (period 2). Analyses included use of linear mixed-effects analysis of covariance, a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and cumulative link mixed tests and model.

RESULTS

Of 106 participants, 91 (86%) completed 12 months follow-up (47.3% female). At baseline, mean&#xb1;SD&#x2009;age was 17.8&#xb1;3.8 years, diabetes duration 9.9&#xb1;5.0 years and HbA1c 8.6&#xb1;1.9% (70&#xb1;21&#x2009;mmol/mol).HbA1c decreased when using FGM versus SMBG (difference -0.44% (4.8 mmol/mol); p=0.006), with greater reduction in those with higher baseline HbA1c (p=0.003). In the FGM&#x2192;SMBG group, HbA1c initially decreased from 8.6&#xb1;2.2% (70&#xb1;24&#x2009;mmol/mol) to 7.9&#xb1;1.1% (62&#xb1;12&#x2009;mmol/mol) at 3 and 6 months (both p<0.05). After SMBG crossover, HbA1c was unchanged (7.9&#xb1;1.1% (63&#xb1;12&#x2009;mmol/mol) at 9 months and 8.1&#xb1;1.3% (65&#xb1;14&#x2009;mmol/mol) at 12 months). In the SMBG&#x2192;FGM group, HbA1c was initially stable (8.6&#xb1;1.4% (70&#xb1;15&#x2009;mmol/mol) at baseline; 8.8&#xb1;1.7% (73&#xb1;19&#x2009;mmol/mol) at 6 months), but decreased after crossover to FGM (8.4&#xb1;1.4% (68&#xb1;15&#x2009;mmol/mol) at 9 months; 8.3&#xb1;0.9% (67&#xb1;10&#x2009;mmol/mol) at 12 months; p=0.023).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of improvement in glycaemic outcomes while using FGM in youth living with T1D in India.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/02/020175).

Leitura na plataforma

Esta pagina mostra nativamente os metadados e o abstract do artigo. Quando o registo tem versao aberta no PubMed Central, a plataforma indica essa disponibilidade e abre o texto completo no repositorio oficial.

Privacidade e Cookies

Utilizamos cookies essenciais para garantir o funcionamento e segurança da sua conta. Com o seu consentimento, usamos cookies analíticos para melhorar a plataforma.

Consulte os detalhes na Política de Cookies.

Impact of flash glucose monitoring versus capillary blood glucose monitoring on glycaemia in Indian youth with type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study. | NextMGF | NextMGF